Seminar on recovery planning with Restart Agency

Seminar on recovery planning with Restart Agency

Published on
28 April 2026
Written by
Communication Staff
Research Pillars
Framing Trajectories
Envisioning Translocality
Enabling Institutions
Enforcing Practices

What does it mean to plan for reconstruction in the midst of a conflict? To what extent can planning serve as a compass in conditions of radical uncertainty and help us “strategically navigate” in the face of evolving conflict dynamics? How is the relationship between long-term perspectives and operational needs discussed and continuously (re)defined?

These are just some of the questions we had the pleasure of discussing last week with Marharyta Borysova and Anastasiia Popovych from Restart Urban Agency, during a two-part event focused on dialogue and reflection on the challenges of recovery planning in the Ukrainian context.

In the morning, our guests delivered a lecture titled “Planning under High Uncertainty: The Ukraine Experience” as part of the course “Fragility and Anti-Fragility in the Spatial Realm,” by Valeria Fedeli within the Master’s program Urban Planning and Policy Design.

In the afternoon, Marharyta and Anastasiia led a seminar on “Envisioning Recovery” as part of the seminar series “Transformative Agencies in/for Contested Spaces,” curated by Irene Bianchi, Maryam Karimi, and Alice Buoli under the umbrella of the OPEN FORUM initiatives by CRAFT (Competence Center for Anti-Fragile Territories).

In addition to discussing theoretical and operational challenges related to defining planning strategies and actions in a constantly evolving context, the seminar also provided an opportunity to reflect on key elements, including:

  • the role of Comprehensive Recovery Programmes (CRP) as integrative tools addressing both war-related impacts and pre-existing territorial vulnerabilities;
  • the need to structure planning across multiple temporal scales (long-term visions, medium-term objectives, short-term actions) under conditions of radical uncertainty;
  • the shift from isolated projects to coordinated strategic initiatives and the associated challenges of prioritisation in contexts of financial volatility, resource constraints, and demographic change;
  • and the importance of multi-scalar governance and participatory approaches, with particular attention to vulnerable groups such as internally displaced persons and veterans, as well as to constraints related to local capacity and institutional fragmentation.

A special thank you to Viktoriia Baltser (Municipality of Voznesensk) and Kateryna Pisotska (Municipality of Vinnytsia) – who joined online – for sharing their on-the-ground experience.

Thanks to Barbara Piga, Nicola Colaninno, Anna Hoblyk, and Arxhenda Lipovica, from DAStU, for participating in the discussion!

More News

Gaza Pheonix: knowledge for peace and reconstruction
28 July 2026

Gaza Pheonix: knowledge for peace and reconstruction

CALL believes Gaza can rebuild itself, in its own way, with the help – because a great deal of help is needed – of those who recognise that Palestine exists: a state, with its own history, its own people, its own culture, and the right to live in peace rather…

Read more
IFe Civic Lab: research, teaching and local action 
20 July 2026

IFe Civic Lab: research, teaching and local action 

Knowledge exchange between the university and local stakeholders lies at the heart of the IFe Civic Lab.

Read more
Peripheral visions, rethinking planning: CALL at the 2026 World Planning Schools Congress
7 July 2026

Peripheral visions, rethinking planning: CALL at the 2026 World Planning Schools Congress

From June 29 to July 3, planning scholars from around the world gathered in Finland for the 6th World Planning Schools Congress, titled Peripheral Visions - Rethinking Planning and organised by AESOP.

Read more